How to Map Packaging Data for EPR Reporting in the Automotive Aftermarket

As Extended Producer Responsibility programs continue to expand across the U.S., automotive aftermarket businesses are discovering that compliance depends heavily on one thing: packaging data.

For many organizations, this realization raises immediate questions. What data is required? Where does it live? And how do we begin organizing it in a way that supports EPR reporting?

Mapping packaging data is not about perfection. It is about building visibility and consistency across complex supply chains.

Why Packaging Data Matters Under EPR

EPR programs rely on packaging data to determine reporting obligations and, in many cases, cost structures. This typically includes information such as:

  • Packaging materials

  • Material weights

  • Packaging formats

  • Where products are placed on the market

For automotive aftermarket businesses with large product portfolios and multiple suppliers, this information is often fragmented or incomplete. EPR makes it necessary to bring that data together in a more structured way.

Where Many Businesses Encounter Challenges

Packaging data challenges are rarely caused by lack of effort. More often, they stem from how aftermarket supply chains are structured.

Common challenges include:

  • Packaging data managed by suppliers rather than brand owners

  • Inconsistent data formats across vendors

  • Manual spreadsheets that are difficult to maintain at scale

  • Limited visibility into secondary or tertiary packaging

Understanding these challenges early helps businesses set realistic expectations and prioritize next steps.

A Practical Approach to Mapping Packaging Data

While EPR requirements vary by state, a practical approach to data mapping often follows the same foundational steps:

  1. Identify products placed in regulated markets
    Start by determining which SKUs are sold into states with active or upcoming EPR programs.

  2. Clarify packaging components
    Break packaging down into primary, secondary, and tertiary components where applicable.

  3. Gather available data from suppliers
    Request material types and weights using consistent templates to improve comparability.

  4. Centralize data where possible
    Even a basic centralized system improves visibility and reduces duplication.

  5. Document assumptions and gaps
    Transparency matters. Documenting known gaps supports future refinement and accuracy.

Mapping packaging data is an iterative process. Early efforts focus on structure and consistency rather than completeness.

Why Early Mapping Makes a Difference

Businesses that begin mapping packaging data early benefit from:

  • Reduced reporting friction

  • Improved internal alignment across teams

  • Greater confidence as requirements evolve

  • Better visibility into potential cost drivers

Rather than reacting to deadlines, early mapping allows organizations to move forward with clarity.

Turning Data Into Readiness

EPR compliance is not achieved through data alone, but data is the foundation that supports informed decision-making.

For automotive aftermarket businesses, mapping packaging data is an important step toward understanding responsibilities, preparing for reporting, and building long-term readiness.

At PARTSLIFE US, we work with aftermarket companies to help translate EPR requirements into practical, business-focused processes. By approaching packaging data methodically, organizations can navigate EPR with greater confidence and control.

Have questions about packaging data and EPR reporting?
PARTSLIFE US is here to help guide those conversations.

Regulatory Note:
This information reflects commonly available EPR guidance and industry understanding as of January 14, 2026. EPR requirements may vary by state and continue to evolve.

Next
Next

Discover What Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Really Means for Your Business in the Automotive Aftermarket